What Paul said. Dave ;-)
At 11:23 AM 15/12/2006, Paul Stenquist wrote: >On Dec 14, 2006, at 9:14 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > > > Does anyone want to have a stab at estimating the practical > > diffraction limit for the K10D? My *ist D resolution seemed drop off > > from about f16, so I assume for a Bayer filtered sensor the practical > > limit would be something like twice the airy disc diameter plus a bit > > to account for the AA filter? > > > > The *ist D sensor has 7.8µm square photosites so the aperture to > > produce an airy disc of twice that is f11 plus one stop fudge. Given > > that the K10D sensor has 6.05µm square photosites applying the similar > > factors would yield a drop in resolution after about f13. > > > > I haven't done any serious comparisons as yet but I'll be keen to see > > if the theory fits the practical. > > > > If you think it's all a crock then you are quite entitled to your > > opinion :-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
