Great capture Paul - Even if they are Chryslers ! <VBG> Is the setting Kensington?
Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: K10D diffraction limiting >I should be in bed. That URL I posted was an example of a shot I had > to take at f32 to get dof, but it was with the 6x7. Rare that one > would need that much dof with aps-c, unless perhaps for macro. > Paul >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2609820&size=lg > > On Dec 14, 2006, at 10:19 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> Yes, I'm here. Must have hit the send button. Don't remember what I >> was trying to say. But I'm definitely interested in the diffraction >> limit. However, I generally try to avoid shooting at an ap smaller >> than f11 to be on the same side. Of course there are situations that >> require a smaller stop. But I figure if I have to have that small a >> stop, I'm not going to worry about diffraction. http://www.photo.net/ >> photodb/photo?photo_id=2609820&size=lg >> On Dec 14, 2006, at 9:44 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: >> >>> On 15/12/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> What Paul said. >>> >>> He's not often lost for words. You still there Paul? :-) >>> >>> -- >>> Rob Studdert >>> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA >>> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 >>> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ >>> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
