But it probably wouldn't fit in the body, and the K10 build quality is far superior to the *istDS. On Dec 5, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> > Actually - I'd be happy with a 10 MP/Shake Reduction version of the > *istDS. > > Cheers > > Brian > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Brian Walters > Western Sydney Australia > > > Quoting Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> On Dec 5, 2006, at 15:44, Adam Maas wrote: >>> You're paying far too much attention to MP count. The 6MP models >> >>> are here to stay, they're just going to get cheaper as time goes >> >>> on. The sensors are proven designs and cheap to produce, the 10MP >> >>> sensors are noisier and more complex (driving up manufacturing >> costs). >> >> Frankly, I would be delighted if there was ever a 6MP version of >> the >> K10D. That would be plenty of camera for me! >> >> K6D? :-) >> >> -Charles >> >> -- >> Charles Robinson >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Minneapolis, MN >> http://charles.robinsontwins.org >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Free Tradeshow Display Price Quotes > Compare tradeshow display prices from multiple suppliers and save! > http://tagline.bidsystem.com/fc/BgLEQfI8a5JTkBltBpRIRSGCwwKzL2OA25la/ > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
