On Nov 28, 2006, at 5:32 AM, David Savage wrote:

> Well considering the Pentax AF-360 FGZ pre dates the release of the
> K10D by quite some time, and works without any reported problems,
> Sigma obviously did something dodgy if they need to upgrade it to work
> with the new K series DSLR's.

Of course they did something dodgy: they backwards-engineered the  
protocol and tested that it worked with the current bodies at the  
time it was introduced. Pentax, being the one creating the K10D,  
could test it for operation with the other two existing flash units  
and modify the design in the new body to make sure it worked.

I hate to step in to Sigma's defense as I think their quality control  
is out of bounds to begin with, but if you accept buying third party   
products that are being backwards-engineered in the first place, from  
that perspective this is a post-facto upgrade to the 500 DG Super  
flash unit.

Godfrey


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to