It's much faster than the *istDS, which I've tried. No comparison. I have two of the transcend cards. I think they're 150X, and I have one Sandisk Ultra II, which I believe is rated at 133X. Paul On Nov 25, 2006, at 11:32 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Sounds like it may even be faster than the istDS and its siblings. > What > card and speed are you using? > > Shel > > > >> [Original Message] >> From: Paul Stenquist > >> By the way, my greatest joy thus far is the write speed and the >> buffer size. I have yet to find myself limited by either. I've >> clicked off five or six frames of RAW with the shutter button held >> down: no problem. And if I hit the preview button after that, the >> image immediately appears. I'm used to standing around and waiting >> with the D. I'm loving this. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
