Well dont post stupid examples and then
later change your story and you wont get
accused of making things up as you go along.

jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 3:38 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS


Oh, f*** you.  Now you're saying I just made this all up.  You're quite
a piece of work.

Shel



> [Original Message]
> From: J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> Date: 11/10/2006 12:34:12 PM
> Subject: RE: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS
>
> It makes a difference because if you didnt
> say you used a 35mm lens in your original
> post you could be saying you did now just
> to save face when you didnt at the time
> of the original post. There is no doubt,
> the slower or wider a lens gets, the harder
> it is to manually focus on any SLR camera with
> a general purpose finder. The image has
> more depth of field in either case which makes
> it harder to focus.
> jco
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 3:19 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS
>
>
> What difference does it make when I used the 35mm lens.  I gave you 
> the benefit of the doubt, and checked both lenses to be sure of my 
> earlier experiences with the 35mm.  What could be more fair.  How 
> could using a 35mm lens when talking about a 35mm lens be "wrong."
>
> Please check your synapses and dendrites.
>
> Shel
>
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: J. C. O'Connell
>
> > But what I am telling you is your "EXPERIENCE"
> > was with a different, totally wrong, lens. You
> > gave the 35mm lens "experience" AFTER your inital
> > post and mentioned nothing of it in your original
> > post which is specifically what I refuting strongly.
> > jco
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From Shel Belinkoff
>
> > I didn't say it's as easy as using the 105, but in truth, it didn't
> > seem much different, either.
> >
> > I notice you're starting to use the same rhetoric as in earlier
> > threads.
> >
> > Once again, totally uncalled for.  My comments are not BS - they
> > reflect my experiences.  BTW, I wasn't trying to prove any point,
just
>
> > sharing my experience.  Once again, YMMV.
> >
> > Shel
> >
> >
> >
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: J. C. O'Connell
> >
> > > YOU missed MY point, and that is that a 35mm lens is NEVER going 
> > > to be as easy as a 105mm lens to focus at the same f-stop/speed on

> > > ANY given camera and YOU gave the 105mm lens as your 
> > > reference/example when the post was about the 35/3.5 lenses in 
> > > particular. Dont tell me that if you use a new camera/finder, that

> > > the 35mm lens is just as easy as a 105mm lens at
>
> > > the same fstop becuase your full of BS if you are trying to say
> that.
> > > It never can be. YOU used the wrong example to prove your point in
> the
> >
> > > first reply post by saying you just used a 105mm lens and had no
> > > problems with it.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Shel Belinkoff
> >
> > > Don't you be confused.  While I used a 105 recently, I've also 
> > > used wide lenses as well.  Until you spend some time using the 
> > > current DSLRs, you've no idea about how bright or useful the 
> > > finder may be with slower and wider lenses.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to