William Robb wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "keith_w" > Subject: Re: PESO - Simple Macro > > >> Another way of saying it is, if "all" you want to do is make magazine >> cover images, carry on! >> If your intent is to portray the image as you SAW it, ignore them.
> If the intent is to make pretty pictures, then why not make them as > pretty as possible? > > William Robb Ahhh, you see, I submit that in a lot of cases, and depending on the photog...recording an image is not "making it pretty," but recording a slice in visual time that will, as closely as possible, freeze what it is you saw, in all aspects. Good, bad or indifferent. That is, if the image is for YOU. On the other hand, to give credence to your position, if you're displaying publicly or recording for 'stock' then the more "perfect" the image, the more worth it has. I do understand that. I just don't agree that each and every shot one makes must be as free from annoyances as is humanly possible. That every shot displayed must be PS'd out of it's mind, just to suit viewers! keith whaley -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
