A couple of questions: How do you know the part in question costs $5.00? Does the $5.00 reflect only the cost of materials, or does it include any manufacturing and setup costs to implement the item in cameras that were designed not to include the part? Even though it's a mechanical part, might there not have to be some software or firmware changes to use the simulator in a camera such as the K10D? What would be the cost of upgrading or changing the firmware to accommodate such a change? How can the "trivial" cost of software be LESS than the _free_ GB code? If the cost is trivial, there's still a cost, and if the GB code was, indeed free (unlikely - someone was paid to work on it), then the trivial cost becomes greater than that which you have self-proclaimed is free.
Why do you keep harping on this? We all know your position, some of us even agree with you, yet you won't just let it go. You drone on and on and on with the same tired and worn out rhetoric, making yourself look all the fool. Are you on some meds that you have neglected to take? Shel > [Original Message] > From: J. C. O'Connell > YOU ARE THE IDIOT. THE PART IN QUESTION COSTS > ABOUT $5 TO PENTAX AND THE SOFTWARE IS TRIVIAL > (LESS THAN THE FREE GB CODE). THAT'S WHY I STATED > $50. WHAT NIKON DOES IS IRRELAVANT, IT'S WHAT PENTAX > DOES THAT MATTERS, DO YOU REALLY THINK THE CAM > SENSOR ADDITION WOULD NECESSITATE A $1200 PRICE > INCREASE? IF YOU DO YOU ARE A FOOL BECAUSE ITS > CHILDS PLAY AND CAME IN COMPLETE CAMERAS THAT > SOLD FOR ONLY $150 FOR YEARS AND YEARS. > JCO -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
