Dear Whack-A-Mole, I didn't say anything about what the prices of the parts to implement the cam follower were. Nikon's cameras that have this archaic bit in them pose an idea at what price level I would expect to see this kind of feature delivered. In the bygone days of film cameras, Nikon delivered cameras comparable in price to the Pentax cameras with the same bits for the same prices as Pentax, so there is some basis for this kind of expectation. I suppose that didn't occur to you ... or does nothing occur to your little mind but whether to just pop up and get hit over the head again? I suppose you're just doing what you know: being a twat with an attitude and without a breath of intelligence.
But you're right: it's what Pentax does that matters. They, like sensible people, would never put this into their camera because they hate you. That's right, it's personal. I know for certain that the Pentax engineering staff has a list of DSLR features they will never implement tagged with your name on it, out of sheer spite. That's because you are an irritant, a loudmouthed cretinous fool for whom the ownership of Pentax equipment is an embarrassment to Pentax. The more you ask for something, the farther into the "never to be implemented" pile it will go. Shut up, and enjoy your auto-erotic self-manipulation. Godfrey On Oct 20, 2006, at 4:35 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > YOU ARE THE IDIOT. THE PART IN QUESTION COSTS > ABOUT $5 TO PENTAX AND THE SOFTWARE IS TRIVIAL > (LESS THAN THE FREE GB CODE). THAT'S WHY I STATED > $50. WHAT NIKON DOES IS IRRELAVANT, IT'S WHAT PENTAX > DOES THAT MATTERS, DO YOU REALLY THINK THE CAM > SENSOR ADDITION WOULD NECESSITATE A $1200 PRICE > INCREASE? IF YOU DO YOU ARE A FOOL BECAUSE ITS > CHILDS PLAY AND CAME IN COMPLETE CAMERAS THAT > SOLD FOR ONLY $150 FOR YEARS AND YEARS. > JCO -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
