Another case of WR ignorance I must say. If you would learn to read and comprehend ENTIRE thread from the beginning you would Have known that I didn't claim most pros were Using pentax and SOMEONE ELSE claimed That Pros and semi-pros using Pentax "didn't care" about K/M lenses, inferring that they knew more than advanced amateurs. I was responding with regards to those Pros and semi-pros who do, regardless of how many there actually are. JCO
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 6:21 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The JCO survey ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: The JCO survey > There is one thing I don't understand about your "pro" > Statement, to pros, cameras are just tools. There is > Nothing worse than not having the right tool for > The job and sometimes AE **IS** the right tool, just > Like **AF** or any other automation is. Its just > Another option to have and a possible choice. Lack of > Options is worse than too many. In other words, youre > Full of BS in saying that it doesn't matter to any Pros > Or semi-pros. Certain features can make certain situations > Go from photographically impossible to possible. Nikon and Canon are the brands of the pro boys, and they need up to date technology to stay competitive. The % of pros using Pentax is almost non existent at this point in time. You are arguing out of ignorance, BTW. If the K/M lens operation requirments are too slow, odds are, the photographer is going to want a more modern lens to get shutter preferred auto and auto focus. You keep taking the most unimportant and try to make them seem important. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
