Decades if you use Rodinal ;-)

-Adam


P. J. Alling wrote:
> Any moderately good photo shop will have them and they keep for months.
> 
> David Savage wrote:
> 
> 
>>If you can source the chemicals, home processing of B&W is quite easy.
>>
>>Dave
>>
>>
>>On 10/19/06, J and K Messervy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>
>>
>>>And if you don't process film yourself?
>>>
>>>I will be taking film to the local pro lab for processing.
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>>>Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:27 PM
>>>Subject: Re: Remedial film photography. :)
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>>And, of course, with B&W film, there's a lot more control on the
>>>>processing
>>>>end, so one can "over expose" the film, or expose for the shadows, and
>>>>develop for the highlights, so that there are no blown highlights.  So,
>>>>for
>>>>a Q&D example, you can rate TX @ 200, cut back the standard processing
>>>>time
>>>>by 25% or so, and get a negative that will print quite well.
>>>>
>>>>Shel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>[Original Message]
>>>>>From: John Francis
>>>>>       
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Your example is extreme, but most films seem to be slightly overrated
>>>>>>in regard to ISO.
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Hardly.  The ISO testing procedure is well-defined, and rigorously
>>>>>followed.  If a film says ISO 400 on the box, you can be darn sure
>>>>>that it will score 400 on the ISO measurement scale.
>>>>>
>>>>>But that doesn't mean blindly loading a DX-coded cassette into
>>>>>your camera, pointing the camera at a random scene, and letting
>>>>>that determine the exposure will produce the results you want
>>>>>(even assuming the average brightness of your subject is anywhere
>>>>>close to 12% grey).  Furthermore, shifting the exposure up the
>>>>>scale (which is what you do if you rate the film at slower than
>>>>>the box speed) will decrease noise in the shadows at the cost of
>>>>>possibly blowing out the highlights, while shifting downwards
>>>>>towards under-exposure will generally increase colour saturation.
>>>>>It's all a matter of choosing what effect you want, and then
>>>>>deciding which film to use, and how to rate it, in order to
>>>>>get close to that result.
>>>>>       
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>[email protected]
>>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>
>> 
>>
> 
> 
> 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to