You could be right.  But it was only comparing f4 to f4.5.  It was
harder to focus than my 55/4 which was even wider and not much faster.
The images obtained with it were just fine.  I chose it over the
75/2.8 because of cost.  I'm not saying it is one I would not get,
only my experience with it.

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Tuesday, October 17, 2006, 9:58:14 AM, you wrote:

JCOC> Mine was EQUAL all the rest of the 8 I had in
JCOC> Terms of contrast. The problem was pure speed
JCOC> And the fact that its wide so more DOF made it even
JCOC> Harder to focus, but, in sunlight it was easy.
JCOC> jco

JCOC> -----Original Message-----
JCOC> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JCOC> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
JCOC> Bruce Dayton
JCOC> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:08 PM
JCOC> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
JCOC> Subject: Re: 35mm equivalent focal length on P6x7

JCOC> I owned one during my 67 days.  My biggest issue with it was that it
JCOC> wasn't very contrasty in the viewfinder - I had more trouble
JCOC> accurately focusing it than any other lens I had (55/4, 75/4.5,
JCOC> 90/2.8, 90/2.8 leaf, 165/2.8, 165/4 leaf, 300/4).

JCOC> -- 
JCOC> Bruce


JCOC> Tuesday, October 17, 2006, 4:17:57 AM, you wrote:

PS>> It's just the reputation that the lens has developed. I never owned
PS>> one. However, it has never been highly regarded. Bill Robb owned
JCOC> one.
PS>> Perhaps he can comment. It's also telling that it was replaced by
JCOC> the
PS>> 75/2.8. Any Pentax lens will deliver good results on the 6x7, but
JCOC> other
PS>> lenses are more desirable and not much more expensive these days.
JCOC> I've
PS>> seen the late version of the 55/4 for less than $300.
PS>> Paul

PS>> On Oct 17, 2006, at 6:48 AM, J and K Messervy wrote:

>>> Hi Paul
>>>
>>> I'm considering a 75mm 4.5 as it is affordable.  Why do you say it
>>> isn't
>>> highly regarded?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> James
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 8:05 PM
>>> Subject: Re: 35mm equivalent focal length on P6x7
>>>
>>>
>>>> Better bets for wide 6x7 lenses are the 55/4 and the 45/4. Look for
>>>> the
>>>> latest version of the 55/4 if you go that way. It has the typography
>>>> on
>>>> the tapered end of the focusing ring. These lenses offer a field of
>>>> view similar to a 28 and 23 respectively. Excellent glass. The
JCOC> 75/4.5
>>>> is not highly regarded. There is a newer 75/2.8 that is superb, but
>>>> it's still pricey and hard to find used.
>>>> Paul
>>>> On Oct 9, 2006, at 11:25 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Conversion factor for 6x7 lenses to 35mm is 1/2X.
>>>>> That is the 165mm 6x7 lens looks like a 82.5mm lens in 35mm.
>>>>> I like the 165/2.8 but it is really a short telephoto.
>>>>> Try the 75/4.5 lens for a 37.5mm equivalent wide in 35mm.
>>>>> It's not too expensive.
>>>>> Regards,  Bob S.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I may be on the verge of purchasing a 6x7 body and I'm wondering
>>>>>> what
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> conversion is for focal lengths since I'm used to thinking in 35mm
>>>>>> focal lengths.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I won't really have much of a budget for lenses, etc so I'll have
JCOC> to
>>>>>> start with only
>>>>>> one.  Considering what I plan to mostly use the body for, I want a
>>>>>> wide angle.  Can
>>>>>> someone please suggest a good wide angle for the 6x7 for
JCOC> landscapes?
>>>>>> Preferably
>>>>>> one that's fairly readily available used and not too expensive.
JCOC> :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>





JCOC> -- 
JCOC> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
JCOC> [email protected]
JCOC> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to