Sophistry at it's finest.
Gonz wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>William Robb wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Have you seen a lot of complaining from a lot of people about it
>>>recently?
>>>Generally, when people are really pissed about something, they find a
>>>way to vent somewhere.
>>>The internet is a good place to vent ones spleen about stuff, but I
>>>haven't seen a lot of whining on the various websites and news/mail
>>>lists that I am on.
>>>
>>>
>>Yep. Even on the *Pentax-specific* discussion boards it's a non-issue.
>>Outside this tiny enclave of the PDML (where only two or three people
>>are adamant about it) no one gives a shit. Game over.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>For good reason too. I mean, if you can take pictures with your 30 year
>old lenses with virtually no loss of functionality, what more can you
>expect? I think Pentax may have made this decision 20 years ago when
>the "A" lenses came out. The linear actuator coupled with the lens
>coding in the contacts gave you all you needed to make the simulator
>redundant. Its now a vestige of the evolution of this mount. Pretty
>much like the human appendix, its there and can sometimes cause
>inflammation (like the aperture simulator periodically does on this
>list), but its utility is questionable moving forward.
>
>rg
>
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
