You're stating an opinion, not a fact. My opinion is that the aperture
simulator is like a little finger. The next part is fact. You don't
miss it much when it's gone, but there are times that not having one is
a real PITA. On the other hand the appendix serves no useful function,
and if you never had one you'll probably never know. You may challenge
my opinion, but it's really annoying when you ignore the facts.
I see no point in continuing a school yard debate with you. I just
wonder if there really is an upcoming K1D, if it has an aperture
simulator, will you be calling for it's removal because it's a useless
appendage?
Mark Roberts wrote:
>P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>
>
>>Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>P. J. Alling wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>An appendix has no function
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Just like a K/M lens' aperture simulator when it's used on a digital
>>>camera.
>>>
>>>
>>Sir, If you must quote do not quote out of context, especially since my
>>post was so small. It's stupid and childish of you to do so since
>>anyone who is interested has already seen it. It doesn't advance your
>>ideas and simply makes you look small. If that's what you want, so be
>>
>>
>it.
>
>
>
>???
>The statement stands up whether it was a quote from anyone or even a
>quote from no one. The fact that you assert the aperture simulator is
>not analogous to an appendix doesn't mean I'm not allowed to point out
>ways in which it is.
>
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
