No, the issue is sample to sample variation on K lenses. A lenses are 
essentially calibrated (A set amount of aperture lever deflection 
indicates a set amount of aperture change). K lenses are designed to 
move until the stop is hit, where the stop is provided by the consistent 
aperture ring itself.

-Adam


Gonz wrote:
> "A" lenses are no different, except that the actuator is linear.  If you 
> put your M or K lense on f22 and move the actuator, it acts the same 
> way.  Since they have to at least work with the mechanical stop based 
> method, this means that they are machined to at least this accuracy.  So 
> it should work, I disagree with you.
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I don't think this is possible because K/M
>> Lenses were not designed for partial closure
>> Of the aperture and do not have consistant
>> Non linear closure from sample to sample. It
>> Was a simple OPEN/CLOSE/OPEN design.
>> jco
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>> Gonz
>> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 4:47 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux
>>
>> The firmware on the Samsungs is definitely different, see the pics 
>> floating around for the K10D samsung equivalent.  The UI is distinctly 
>> different.
>>
>> If the firmware is different, then they could actually implement the 
>> whole aperture simulator thing in firmware if I understand correctly how
>>
>> its supposed to work. The way you could do it is by inputing the lens 
>> being used, say K50 1.4 into the body UI when you powered up the camera.
>>
>>   All they would need would be the actual non-linear response of the 
>> aperture linkage (which would be in a table in the firmware) and they 
>> could close down the aperture to the correct position as dialed in by 
>> the user on the body.  The user would have to set the lens to f22 or 
>> whatever the min on the lens is, effectively mimicing the "A" setting. 
>> Knowing exactly what lens is mounted would be used not only for the 
>> aperture response, but the focal length for SR, the wide open aperture, 
>> and possibly even used for multi-segment metering.
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Umm....  Hello!  It's another moot question!  Samsung bodies are, and 
>>> will always be, re-named Pentax bodies.  They will not produce a
>> unique 
>>
>>> k-mount body.  Stop with the surveys and get a grip.
>>>
>>
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to