Cory Papenfuss wrote: > > To say absolute statements such as your above, "Samsung bodies > are, and will always be, re-named Pentax bodies." ... or (paraphrased > from previous posts), "The aperture simulator is dead, never to return." > Without proof, I think those are rather bold statements.... Might be true, > but certainly might not just as easily. >
Put money on it. It may be a bold statement but I'm willing to put money on the line. Are you? > > ... but most here have agreed that marketing is what got us into > the lack of aperture simulator mess to begin with. And this is the part I don't give a crap about. I don't care if it was sunspots that made the aperture simulator go away. Who cares why? Really? And why do you think surveys and a raving lunatics rantings will bring it back? -- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
