There are no digital legacy bodies and the thread is about DSLRs. jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom C Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 4:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: The JCO survey
Honestly, JCO, in most other cases people interested in using and exploiting legacy lenses would simply use legacy bodies. Tom C. ----Original Message Follows---- From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: The JCO survey Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:52:06 -0400 Not when the long discontinued lenses were built to last A lifetime and they are. jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Maas Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 3:40 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The JCO survey Support of long-discontinued products is a trivial matter. -Adam J. C. O'Connell wrote: > Pentax product support is not a trivial matter > When you are a Pentax Fan like myself. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 1:43 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: The JCO survey > > If JCO can generate this much anger over a trivial matter, one has to > wonder how he deals with truly important differences of opinion. A > frightening thought. Let's hope he lives alone. > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>I can't believe you're not giving it a rest by now. If you >>>don't you're >>>gonna have a coronary. It's really *not* the most important >>>thing in the >>>world. >>> >> >>You're right about that. I met someone a few weeks ago who was >>collecting the little twists of sugar from the train we were on. She >>said it was because "there's nothing worse than coming home to find >>out you've run out of sugar". I kind of agree, even though I don't use >>sugar. I reckon having sugar in the house is probably the most >>important thing in the world. >> >>We could probably have a PDML survey: what is the most important thing >>in the world? >> >>I will not be collating the results. >> >>Bob >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
