Don't know whether it's down to using Epson's printer and papers or not: I 
have  couple of mono prints on my office wall, unprotected but with no 
direct sunlight on them which have faded to a rather nasty shade of green!

John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Perry Pellechia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: My Canon BCI 6 Ink Experiment update


> On 10/12/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 12/10/06, Perry Pellechia, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>> >Dave,
>> >This fading of prints off the Canon printers is highly dependent on
>> >the paper used.  I have a print off my S800 on Kodak glossy photo
>> >paper that has not faded at all after four years.  This photo is
>> >hanging in my office under fluorescent light with nothing protecting
>> >it.  The same photo printed on Canon paper faded pretty rapidly.  The
>> >Kodak had some sort of coating that the ink penetrated into.
>>
>> Interesting. I used Ilford Gallerie smooth pearl and smooth gloss....
>>
>> --
>>
> When the S800 (BCI 6 inks) first came out there was a pretty long
> discussion on the DPreview printer forum about this.  The Canon "Photo
> Paper Pro" was the worst in fade resistance.  This was during a time
> when the Epsons were getting a bad name for their print fading.  The
> Kodak paper (which I do not think is produced like it was back then)
> was surprising better with the Canon and Epson dye based inks.  Of
> course the pigment based inks the newer class printers use are
> supposed to be much better in fade resistance.
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to