frank theriault wrote:
> On 10/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> <snip>
>> So, yeah, AOL truly hoovers sometimes, OTOH, it also isn't as bad as some
>> think.
>>
>> Just my .02.
>>
>> Marnie  And I prefer when I, a user knocks it, than when a non-user knocks
>> it. ;-)
> 
> Marnie,
> 
> I saw Bob's advice to use G-mail or another web-based e-mail for PDML,
> and I agree wholeheartedly.  I know a lot of people think G-mail is
> the devil incarnate as well, but if you used it ~only~ for PDML (as I
> do), you'll find that you never have a full mailbox, and unlike
> Hotmail and Yahoo, it (as Bob said) threads nicely.  This would leave
> your AOL for non-PDML stuff, and therefore relatively un-used.
> 
> I recently went "underground" for a month or so and finally decided
> that I had to delete old threads that I knew I'd never get to.  It
> ended up being over a thousand ~threads~ (no doubt tens of thousands
> of individual posts) yet I was still only using about 10% of my
> capacity!
> 
> I've only got 99 invitations left, so let me know real quick if you
> need one.  <g>
> 
> cheers,
> frank

GMail is just fine as long as you don't mind Google reading your mail.

It's great for mailing lists and such, where the mail is going into a 
public archive anyways.

-Adam

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to