I don't think the shot is nearly as under as you suspect, however, I did rate the iso 100 film at 125 (something I do a lot).
It is blue to be sure but I already corrected out a lot more blue than what is there now. Any more and it looked unbalanced to me. -Brendan --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The photo is way too blue - a quick click on auto > color in PS changed that > in a hurry. While still not ideal, the results > looked a lot better and > more natural. > > The photo looks under exposed - dark, detail-less > shadows, especially in > the foreground, do nothing but detract from the > mountain and the grandeur > of the scene. The pic could be opened up a bit in > PS with > Shadows/Highlights I'm sure, although I suspect some > detail is lost forever > if you've underexposed too much. You may be > borderline in that area. > > A warming pol (especially at high altitudes and when > using Ektachrome) can > often be helpful. > > The pic has some potential but it needs a fair > amount of correction and > adjustment. > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Brendan MacRae > > > Here's one from over the weekend near Convict Lake > in > > the eastern Sierras. This is the peak just to the > > south of the lake. > > > > Kodak E100G, I want to say around f8 1/90 sec, > MLU. I > > used a polarizer in the rear holder. > > > > http://www.members.aol.com/figgaro/convict.jpg > > > > File size is around 158KB. May slow load on some > > systems. > > > > Comments always welcomed. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
