Yeah, it takes a rear filter, 67mm size, that's what I used. -Brendan
--- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not familiar with your lens, but early on you > said it took rear filters. > Is that correct? > > The rear filter on my 600 is 43mm. > B+H has a rear polarizer for my 600 but the last > time I checked they wanted > around > $250 for it. > > Kenneth Waller > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brendan MacRae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 400mm f4 > ED (IF) > > > >A 67mm Tiffen. > > > > -Brendan > > > > --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> BTW - what polarizer did you use, what size is > it?. > >> I have a rear slip in > >> filter ability in my 600 FA, but I've not gotten > >> one > >> due to exorbitant cost > >> & limited usage. > >> > >> Inquiring mind wants to know .... > >> > >> Kenneth Waller > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Brendan MacRae" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 400mm > f4 > >> ED (IF) > >> > >> > >> > Ok. I'll play with it a bit more. > >> > > >> > -Brendan > >> > > >> > --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> I did a quick & simple levels adj & > >> shadow/highlight > >> >> adj & on you image in > >> >> CS2 - the details really came out. > >> >> > >> >> >When I tweaked cures to bring out more > >> >> > detail in the shadow area (especially in the > >> area > >> >> just > >> >> > below and to the right of the peak) it > looked > >> >> plain > >> >> > bad to my eye. So, I left it alone. > >> >> > >> >> Well, you were there & know what it looked > like > >> in > >> >> person so I'll defer to > >> >> that. > >> >> > >> >> BTW - what polarizer did you use, what size is > >> it?. > >> >> I have a rear slip in > >> >> filter ability in my 600 FA, but I've not > gotten > >> one > >> >> due to exorbitant cost > >> >> & limited usage. > >> >> > >> >> Kenneth Waller > >> >> > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >> From: "Brendan MacRae" > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 > 400mm > >> f4 > >> >> ED (IF) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Yeah, curves and minus blue. > >> >> > > >> >> > I hope it's not too dark on your monitor. It > >> looks > >> >> > good on mine (mine is also calibrated). > >> >> > > >> >> > I didn't want to lose the moodiness of the > >> shot. > >> >> That > >> >> > meant letting some of the image stay dark as > it > >> is > >> >> in > >> >> > the original. When I tweaked cures to bring > out > >> >> more > >> >> > detail in the shdow area (especially in the > >> area > >> >> just > >> >> > below and to the right of the peak) it > looked > >> >> plain > >> >> > bad to my eye. So, I left it alone. > >> >> > > >> >> > -Brendan > >> >> > > >> >> > --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> I too like shooting landscapes with my > longer > >> >> lenses > >> >> >> - 300 & 600mm! > >> >> >> > >> >> >> This image is dark on my calibrated > monitor. > >> >> Details > >> >> >> appear to be there but > >> >> >> hard to discern. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Any adjustment after scanning? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Kenneth Waller > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >> >> From: "Peter Fairweather" > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 > >> 400mm > >> >> f4 > >> >> >> ED (IF) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On 10/12/06, Brendan MacRae > >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> Here's one from over the weekend near > >> Convict > >> >> >> Lake in > >> >> >> >> the eastern Sierras. This is the peak > just > >> to > >> >> the > >> >> >> >> south of the lake. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Kodak E100G, I want to say around f8 > 1/90 > >> sec, > >> >> >> MLU. I > >> >> >> >> used a polarizer in the rear holder. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> http://www.members.aol.com/figgaro/convict.jpg > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> File size is around 158KB. May slow load > on > >> >> some > >> >> >> >> systems. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Comments always welcomed. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -Brendan > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > __________________________________________________ > >> >> >> >> Do You Yahoo!? > >> >> >> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best > >> spam > >> >> >> protection around > >> >> >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> >> >> >> [email protected] > >> >> >> >> > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Dear Brendan > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > These pages are supposed to be about > >> obsolete > >> >> >> equipment, fancy posting > >> >> >> > a photo :>) > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Lovely picture, will save up for the > lens, > >> >> might > >> >> >> take some time > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Thanks > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Peter > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
