Overcompensation is no worse than undercompensation per se, It's the only magnitude of the error in either direction That determines which is "worse". jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Digital Image Studio Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:48 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K100D Anti-shake On 12/10/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why? Because under correction will likely be less offensive than over correction (which would be the case if the FL was set longer than the actual lenses FL) -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
