And WHERE in ANY of my posts did I say it was left out for "cost or technical" reasons? I only said that Pentax is moving to the future.
-- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net J. C. O'Connell wrote: > No one can take you seriously if you honestly belive > That the K/M support was left out for cost or technical > Reasons, which would the only legitimate reasons to leave > It out IMHO, especially on $1k cameras like the forcoming > 10D. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Christian > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 3:38 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > Of course I understand. But here is the difference between you and me: > I DON'T CARE! > > I sold all my K/M lenses when I bought the *ist D and replaced them with > > A, F or FA versions. The fact that I sold all that and now use the EOS > system is irrelevant. Like I said before, Pentax is finally producing a > > competitive camera and is finally interested in producing lenses I'm > interested in. will they abandon this type of mount and screw us all > into buying even more lenses? Come on. What are you insane? They have > clearly demonstrated a direction they wish to go and are pursuing it > with actual products. > > By your logic, Canon or Nikon could screw all their "loyal" customers > and change their mounts to, as you put it, "get you to rebuy again for > no reason." That's crazy, paranoid, conspiracy theory talk and sinks > your entire argument. No one can take you seriously. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
