I'd just note that it's about the same size as a Canon EF body cap. -Adam
P. J. Alling wrote: > It's smaller, really a pancake, since it has no aperture ring. It's a > DA lens that covers full frame, but it's not guarantied to cover full > frame. If you use it on film and don't like the results you have no > right to complain. > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: > > >>I wasn't aware that they had added a new pancake and already >>Stated that. Is it as small as the original pancake? I still >>Am not clear as to whether the new one is APS or FF? >>jco >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >>gfen >>Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:18 PM >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>Subject: RE: Well, that's it, I cracked. >> >>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote: >> >> >> >>>Sorry for my error, isnt this a APS only format lens? >>> >>> >> >>He zigs, he zags! >> >>Wasn't that the topic of discussion here? Refusal to buy a Pentax DSLR >>because you can't use your K mount lenses the way that God intended them >> >>to be? That Pentax "professional" DSLRs should include this option (and >>for the record, I'm not disagreeing with you, no sir, I agree completely >> >>on this, but even I relented and am attempting to move on)? >> >>And then, to back it up, you offered us the inability to use the >>M40/2.8, >>only to be stymied when you realized there wasn't just an updated >>40/2.8, >>but additional pancake lenses in the line? >> >>Maybe your argument gets easier to follow upon subsequent readings, but >>on >>our maiden voyage here, I'm not sure I can figure out the destination >>we're piloting to. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
