Sorry for my error, isnt this a APS only format lens? jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Maas Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 11:58 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Well, that's it, I cracked.
Well, except for the 40mm f2.8 DA Limited Pancake, you know? Essentially the exact same lens in AF form? -Adam J. C. O'Connell wrote: > The pankcake 40mm F2.8 M lens is just another example > Of a lens where there is NO NEW EQUIV. > These lenses should be fully supported as you cant > Even buy a new one like it if you wanted to. > joc > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > gfen > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:02 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Well, that's it, I cracked. > > On Sat, 7 Oct 2006, Adam Maas wrote: > >>DA Limiteds are already here. 21 f3.2 Pancake, 40 f2.8 Pancake and the > > >>70 f2.4 Pancake due any moment. The 40 is quite cheap ($300CDN), the >>other two are more money, but still a lot cheaper than FA limiteds. > > > The downside is I don't want "pancake" lenses, I want larger units with > some holding space on 'em. And I want that 21mm faster than 3.2. I'd > trade > off the "pancake" ability for another 1.5 or 2 stops of speed at the > same > price point, but what do I know? I mostly make this up as I go along... > > As for a 70/2.4? Eh, whatever. An FA50/1.4 will probably be under cost > and > 1.33 stops faster. Again, maybe the little pancake thing appeals to > someone, somewhere, but it ain't me. > > Its the right direction, but not what I'm looking for exactly (then > again, > what I'm mostly looking for is something to complain about). > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
