Christian wrote: > Adam Maas wrote: > >>Honestly, I don't think I'd consider a K1D without an aperture >>simulator. > > > Honestly, I don't think you'll ever see another 35mm-style k-mount > Pentax body with an aperture simulator. Ever. Even the last film body > they produced didn't have it. Pentax is done with it. Period. Now... > If only you guys could just get over it. BooHoo, I can't use my old > lenses the way I want to. Pentax doesn't give a shit about you. They > are looking, oh yeah that's right, ahead. To the future. New lenses, > new features. The past? Well that's just the past and good on 'em for > finally stepping it up and producing interesting things and trying to > compete for my $$. >
Christian, I'm one of the guys saying it's no big deal. But a flagship body is a different case. I want it to have everything the Nikon D2Xs does, including mechanical aperture coupling. If it doesn't have that, it's not a flagship to me (and frankly, it would be a selling feature for me, since the K10D pretty much covers what I need in a body). -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
