> Because there's no actual gain from making a subframe lens at that > length, so no reason to do a DA lens.
Could you explain further? I was wondering why the long lenses were D-FA too, and I'm not sure I understand what you mean. John Celio -- http://www.neovenator.com AIM: Neopifex "Hey, I'm an artist. I can do whatever I want and pretend I'm making a statement." -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
