Because there's no actual gain from making a subframe lens at that length, so no reason to do a DA lens.
-Adam Alan Chan wrote: > Why D-FA, not DA? > > Regards, > Alan Chan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, 5 October, 2006 13:11 > Subject: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF > > > There are rumors at Dpreview that such a lens is indeed in the works. Can > anyone confirm this? > This is a dream lens for me > > Pål > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
