Scientific evidence is forthcoming. Your patience will be rewarded. :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm yet to be convinced that the Pentax DA lens line is real quality glass > like the FA and older Pentax primes. They strike me as being cheap, light, > and plastic. I have not read or seen any real scientific lens tests on > them. I have not heard anything other than anecdotal subjective opinions > that are more likely gushing adoration of the Pentax brand than anything > else. > > Nothing's ever as good as it gets! :-) > > >>With the advent of super wides to cover the hole left by 1.5x crop >>factor, its not much of an issue to me any longer. The 12-24 is an >>amazing lens. The only remaining problem is noise due to smaller photo >>site sizes. If Pentax has done a good job managing this in the K10D, >>there is not a whole lot more that the FF is going to offer for the >>considerable premium it would require. I think the K10D has the >>potential to be about as good as it gets for an APS sized camera. >> >>rg >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
