The 200mm f4 Micro is the current version of that lens. It's not their newest Macro lens though, which is the 105mm f2.8 VR AF-S G.
-Adam Peter Fairweather wrote: > I've looked on the magazine website www.photographymonthly.com where > there is a discussion group. In fairness to Nikon (will that phrase > get me barred from PDML?) it was their old 200mm lens not the latest > VR xyz etc. Doesn't stop them charging £1000+ for it tho'! > > Peter > > On 9/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>In a message dated 9/2/2006 5:59:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time, >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >>>The top lens was the Sigma 100mm with 88/100 which >>>ranked far above >>>the 150 and 180 offerings from this company. In >>>second place was the >>>Tamron 90mm, marginally ahead of the Pentax. >>>(86/100) >>> >>>One hopes the magazine does not fold as a result of >>>poor advertising revenue!! >>> >>>Peter >> >>======== >>I have the Tamron 90mm, several on this list do, and it is very, very nice. >> >>Marnie aka Doe >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
