This pisses me off more than anything else. Good lenses are never obsolete. There's no reason except marketing for them to be so, especially given the composite electromechanical system that Pentax is using. No I don't expect to see the aperture simulator return. I just don't see any reason not to support it, except greed.
John Forbes wrote: >Unlikely, I feel. But there are other ways of making a better camera than >introducing compatibility with obsolete equipment. > >To satisfy your curiosity, why not read the recent threads on the subject? > >John > >On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:11:12 +0100, Jon Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > > >>I'm curious, what have I missed regarding the K10D >>that spurred this statement? Will it have better >>compatibility with the K and M series lenses? >> >> >>--- John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> And who knows, when >>>the K10D comes out, the market for any K lens may >>>get a considerable >>>boost. If it's half as good as it's rumoured to be, >>>it'll be great. >>> >>> >>__________________________________________________ >>Do You Yahoo!? >>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> >> > > > > > -- Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler. --Albert Einstein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
