If not you'll hear the howling everywhere...
Cotty wrote:
>
>
>>>So let me get this right. If USM or it's Pentax-monikered
>>>equivalent is
>>>introduced, anyone that wants to take advantage of it is going to have
>>>to buy new lens(es) ?
>>>
>>>
>
>On 31/8/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>>Exactly. One must have lenses with built-in USM motor for USM to
>>work :-) But I guess new mount would be back compatible, so older
>>lenses would work the way they usually did ;-)
>>
>>
>
>Including body-driven AF lenses? I mean, will a K10D have an AF motor
>inside the body as well?
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
