On 8/30/06 10:00 AM, "graywolf", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I would like to point out that that white paper is gray at best. Its
> purpose is not informational but promotional.

I agree. It's very obvious in the way it is written.  Nevertheless, a good
reading material :-).

> Another point is that if you do not have the tools to manufacture what
> you want to sell, you eventually produce the tooling to do it. Put
> another way, if you can not now produce the FF sensors in a one step
> process, that does not mean you will not be able to in a couple of years.

I agree with this too.

> And on your final comment below, I guess something the size of a MZ-S
> would be too big to carry (after all, Pentax has produced a FF prototype
> that size). For non-photographers any camera is too big and heavy to
> carry. Many a serious photographer hauls an 8x10 and all the
> paraphernalia around without a complaint.

I just do not want to become a pro, and have no talent either :-).  MZ-S was
fine.  But the paper is talking about 1Ds etc.  No thanks to even 5D.

Cheers,

Ken


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to