John, 
Certainly a thought. I am due for a new eye glass prescription.
My feeling in this case is that reflections of the 36" dia. white
reflector, along my tendency to nudge contrast to lend depth to images,
has been a distraction.
Early a.m. sun was coming from behind and to the right. Reflector
certainly removed shadows.
All this critiquing is having its effect in my stepping back from my
past uploading habits.
Thanks for thoughts.

Jack

--- John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It's a lovely picture, Jack.  I agree with the various criticisms,
> which  
> are technical in nature, but the concept and composition and deep
> colours  
> work well - for me, anyway - and transcend the slight technical  
> imperfections.
> 
> Sounds obvious, but have you had your eyes tested recently?  A
> tendency to  
> over-sharpening could possibly be a response to your seeing blurrily.
>   
> This might also explain why you don't see the over-sharpening
> yourself.
> 
> John
> 
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 05:45:20 +0100, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > William,
> > No flash. White reflector.
> > So, we now have sucking over sharpening?
> > Otherwise, how do you like it? :-]]
> > Thanks for thoughts.
> >
> > Jack
> >
> >
> >
> > --- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jack Davis"
> >> Subject: Re: PESO Dawn Jewlery
> >>
> >>
> >> > Paul,
> >> > Are you really serious about it's possibly being "over
> sharpened"
> >> or
> >> > is
> >> > this a spin off play on the recent Columbine exchanges?
> >> > You say "perhaps", does that mean you feel it is or you haven't
> >> > decided?
> >> > If you feel it is over sharpened, PLEASE clue me as to what it
> is
> >> you
> >> > see that causes you to reach that conclusion. Could you be
> >> confusing
> >> > "contrast" with something else?
> >> > Do I have a unique monitor?
> >>
> >>
> >> My initial reaction was that it is oversharpened and too contrasty
> as
> >>
> >> well.
> >> If you used flash, you used too much of it.
> >> Also the background sucks, and appears to be suffering from
> >> oversharpening.
> >>
> >> William Robb
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to