Aaron, this, of course, is about 'all else being equal'.

Jack

--- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> On Aug 17, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> 
> > Only problem is, I tend to examine even prints with a loupe, at
> least
> > intelectually speaking. In a way, it's like having 500 hp under the
> > hood but not needing it or using it. Still a rush knowing it's
> there.
> > Does one "need" camera RAW, etc, etc..?
> 
> My Epson Stylus Pro 7500 is very old, slow and low-res by today's 
> standards, and yet people find the results breathtaking.
> 
> It's not at all about the droplet size, it's about learning to get
> the 
> most out of your printer -- if you can't use the thing to its fullest
> 
> potential, your prints will be lacking to matter how small your 
> droplets are.
> 
> It's one of those things where people obsess over the wrong part of
> the 
> technology.
> 
> -Aaron
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to