--- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Aug 17, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Only problem is, I tend to examine even prints > with a loupe, at least > > intelectually speaking. In a way, it's like having > 500 hp under the > > hood but not needing it or using it. Still a rush > knowing it's there. > > Does one "need" camera RAW, etc, etc..? > > My Epson Stylus Pro 7500 is very old, slow and > low-res by today's > standards, and yet people find the results > breathtaking. > > It's not at all about the droplet size, it's about > learning to get the > most out of your printer -- if you can't use the > thing to its fullest > potential, your prints will be lacking to matter how > small your > droplets are. > > It's one of those things where people obsess over > the wrong part of the > technology. > > -Aaron > Well stated Aaron. I with you on that. -Brendan > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
