But Tom, your posts about Pentax are scurrilous lies:-)) Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Actually I perceive his post to be fairly accurate, based on the occcasions > I've said anything negative regarding the Pentax product or company. > > > > Tom C. > > "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or > numbered." > > > > > > > > >From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > >Subject: Re: photo dot net thread mentioning the pdml > >Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:15:44 -0600 > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Scott Loveless" > >Subject: photo dot net thread mentioning the pdml > > > > > > > There's a recent thread over at the photodotnet Pentax forum that > > > mentions the PDML in a rather, well, unforgiving light. It made me > > > laugh out loud. Enjoy: > > > http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00Hfdd&tag= > > > >I remember Wigwam. > >I don't see anything in my archived sent items that insulted him, so it > >wan't me that peed in his ear. > > > >William Robb > > > > > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >[email protected] > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
