Well, they're scurrilous anyway... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>But Tom, your posts about Pentax are scurrilous lies:-)) >Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- >From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>Actually I perceive his post to be fairly accurate, based on the occcasions >>I've said anything negative regarding the Pentax product or company. >> >> >> >>Tom C. >> >>"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or >>numbered." >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >>>Subject: Re: photo dot net thread mentioning the pdml >>>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:15:44 -0600 >>> >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: "Scott Loveless" >>>Subject: photo dot net thread mentioning the pdml >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>There's a recent thread over at the photodotnet Pentax forum that >>>>mentions the PDML in a rather, well, unforgiving light. It made me >>>>laugh out loud. Enjoy: >>>>http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00Hfdd&tag= >>>> >>>> >>>I remember Wigwam. >>>I don't see anything in my archived sent items that insulted him, so it >>>wan't me that peed in his ear. >>> >>>William Robb >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>[email protected] >>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > > > > -- When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
