You're headed in the right direction but your conclusions are wrong. ;) -Aaron
On Aug 15, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Vic Mortelmans wrote: > OK. let's try to do some semantical analysis on the hints... > > Aaron Reynolds wrote: >> It's a feature that's so much >> of a no-brainer, > > It's not involving advanced mechanical or electronical controls or > software processing. > >> and yet as far as I know not a single DSLR out there >> at any price, including ones using the same sensor, have it. > > Can we conclude it's something the camera 'does' to the sensor, that no > other does? (and it's not involving moving it for any purpose, as > confirmed by Aaron). > >> Brothers, I kid you not -- I may be selling my 67. Naturally, I have >> to see it in action to see if it matches up to what the advantage >> should be in theory. But if it does... holy crap. > > We can conclude that it's something the 67 can do, as well as probably > most professional 120 film SLR camera's? (I was wondering if any 35mm > SLR can do it...) > > --------- > > Doesn't help that much, but let's try some more things: > > - the 6x7 picture format (contrary to the 3x4 of regular DSLR?) > - or more general: a (nearly) square sensor, so you're out of trouble > choosing landscape or portrait framing (or maybe you can choose, while > holding the camera straight?) > - if the sensor is 3x4, position it in portrait position in the camera, > thus gaining in compactness (would it?)? (but that's more of a > half-frame feature than a 67-feature) > - I'm out > > groeten, > > Vic > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
