Perry Pellechia wrote: > On 7/12/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Now, I'm plenty impressed with the performance of the MacBook 2Ghz >>with 2G RAM in it. The screen size compared to my PowerBook G4 15" is >>really not all that much different, and with native software it's >>very very fast. The MacBook Pro 15" was first off the line and early >>production examples have had some issues ... I'm not sure that the >>MacBook 13" is that much less than the Pro 15", although the price is >>quite a bit less. However, if you're going to using a desktop monitor >>and such, the Pro's improved video card and such might be appealing. >> >>Godfrey >> > > I was about to order the 13" Macbook, but I was concerend with the > lower end video and shared memory. Overall it looks like a nice > machine. I wish Apple did not skimp of the graphics. >
Apple didn't really skimp on the graphics, given the target market of the machine. The MacBook is a low-end machine (And actually cheaper and faster than the equivalent Dell 640m). -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
