An additional reply comment after re-reading your reaction post. The subtle pines images seen at the lower right were the only "background" available. Saw nothing of the lake, island or rim. Just dense fog for 'prox 24 hrs. The point that nothing was sacrificed I thought worth making. To me, the odd tree combination and stance, together with the mottled old/dirty snow base, was not enough to justify the shot, so I got "creative". My point in putting it up was largely about the integrity of manipulation.
Jack --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep, that sun shadow thing is a great distraction. Adds nothing to > the > photo, imo, and takes away from some subtle details in the > background. > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Jack Davis > > > Taken 10 years ago on a foggy AM at Crater Lake, OR. > > I've always felt a little guilty about the donut shadow. Should I? > > Mamiya 6, 75mm lens on T-Max 100. > > http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=121 > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
