It was a cat photo; that's enough for me! I think all pet photos should carry a warning in the subject line: "[pet]".
That way I could bin them more easily! I have no doubt that some of them are excellent photos but they simply do not interest me. Keith McG Cotty wrote: > On 7/7/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> No Paul, there's not a lot of empty space on top. Their ID and information >> papers take up some of the top part of the frame, which is, imo as the >> photographer, is an important part of their story. Otherwise they're just >> a couple of cats in a cage. And no, you can't see their feet as there's a >> part of the cage just below that obscures them. No matter what angle I'd >> have taken the photo from, you'd never see much more below what you see >> now, other than a little more of the cage. > > This is why I am killfiled. > > Shel is quite happy to post a pic, but the moment someone suggests an > alternative preference, he gets goes defensive and woe betide if you > don't see things His Way. > > His photography is skilled and most of it is excellent but his attitude > is bollocks. > > But he won't be reading this. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
