On 7/8/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the photo was taken in portrait orientation most of the paperwork would > be lost, as would some details of what's in the cage, but then you'd have > more to complain about ;-)) Hmmm ... maybe that's a fair trade off <LOL>
As I said I didn't know if it was possible. > What more do you need to know? The basic info is there for you. I don't "need" to know more. I just find that I keep reading the tag & I can see that there was more info & I'm curious as to what it was. Weired, I know :-) Dave > > [Original Message] > > From: David Savage > > > I don't know if it's would have been possible, but I would have liked > > to seen this framed in the portrait orientation. > > > > With the shot as taken, the image of those cute, but sad looking, fur > > balls and the inclusion of the "Animal ID" tag has me wishing I could > > read more of it & know more about them. Maybe I'm just being weird, > > but I keep getting drawn to it. > > > > Despite your recent funk Shel, this is a very good shot. > > >> http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/brothers.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
