Bill,

Interesting but fair comment.  So all other genre's are not
repetitive?  What makes this one so and not others such as sports or
street or flowers or portraits or landscapes?  More wanting to know
your thoughts - not defending myself.  Almost all semi-macro flower
pics are relatively the same, as are cats and dogs and people, etc.

I would be curious if many others feel the same.

Anyway, I do appreciate your candor - it is always good to hear
positive and negative comments - especially if I can learn from them.

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Thursday, June 29, 2006, 4:39:29 PM, you wrote:


WR> ----- Original Message ----- 
WR> From: "Bruce Dayton"
WR> Subject: PESO - Climbing to the Top


>> Hello pdml,
>>
>> Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
>> ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/6.7
>>
>> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3175.htm
>>
>> Comments welcome

WR> You seem to be trying to invent a genre unto yourself it seems.
WR> I'm finding these pictures to be a little repetitive, and a little too
WR> minimalist.
WR> Technically, they look fine, but the aesthetic leaves me cold.

WR> William Robb 






-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to