That is exactly my point. It doesn't have to be digital capture to be able to post process and make something look 'digital' or way over the top, for that matter. All it takes is the desire to do so.
I think the thread started with someone feeling like digital capture all looked worse than film or some such. -- Best regards, Bruce Wednesday, June 28, 2006, 4:33:28 PM, you wrote: TC> There's plenty that can be done post scanning as well, so I don't believe TC> this is straight Velvia. TC> Tom C. >>From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>Subject: Re: Cartoon effect >>Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:13:48 -0700 >> >>It is interesting to note that he is using Pentax 645 with Velvia - >>not a digital capture at all. Shows you can do just as shocking work >>with film as digital. All that is needed is a little desire <grin>. >> >>-- >>Best regards, >>Bruce >> >> >>Wednesday, June 28, 2006, 3:01:30 PM, you wrote: >> >>BW> I don't know if this is exactly what you mean, but when I opened this >>BW> webpage and saw the pictures I actually flinched, and I don't think >>BW> that's happened to me before looking at photos: >>BW> http://www.jturnerphotography.com/ >> >>BW> These seem to me to be at least as devoid of taste as the Stepford >>BW> women. Are these perhaps Stepford landscapes? >> >>BW> Bob >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
