Actually they're not that bad if you don't view them as photographs. They looked to me like some 1930's maybe 1940's calendar art. The fact that they are photographs just shows that the photographer didn't think his work would stand on it's own.
Don Sanderson wrote: >Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee....UCK!!!! > >D > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >>Bob W >>Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 5:02 PM >>To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' >>Subject: RE: Re: Cartoon effect >> >> >> >> >>>>Looks over-saturated to me, otherwise, v nice. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>There you have it. I metered off the greenery, it was a >>>nicely overcast day. All settings in camera and software >>>were standard. It just looks wrong. Pretty but wrong. >>> >>>Not that slide film would have done much better - just wrong >>>in a different way..... >>> >>> >>> >>I don't know if this is exactly what you mean, but when I opened this >>webpage and saw the pictures I actually flinched, and I don't think >>that's happened to me before looking at photos: >>http://www.jturnerphotography.com/ >> >>These seem to me to be at least as devoid of taste as the Stepford >>women. Are these perhaps Stepford landscapes? >> >>Bob >> >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> > > > -- When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
