John Forbes wrote: > If it is meant to be a showcase, why not have a panel of judges to select > the 50 best PAWs and PESOs each month, and then put them into a gallery? > Irfanview can produce a suitable gallery with thumnnails at the press of a > button, so there is little work involved.
Points in reply... 1) Putting up a PAW or PESO is, for me, more work than submitting to PUG. Note that I did say "for me". (I haven't seen a photo-hosting site yet that I am happy with.) 2) I don't really see the point of creating a gallery of photos that most of us will already have looked at, and perhaps commented on. 3) An important element of PUG seems to be that it is themed. A gallery of "bests" is not going to have that. 4) PUG is specifically Pentax, whereas PAWs and PESOs are done using a variety of gear. Whether PUG should be stay restricted to Pentax was discussed a few months ago with the conclusion that it should. Keith McG -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
