I agree. Although all my PESO shots are dimensionally generous, the file size is always relatively low. I just took a look at the folder where I keep all the shots I've linked for the past couple of years. Only one, the recent IR "Pond" photo exceeds 200K. Most are well below 150K. Some are less than 100K. Paul
-------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > There's no reason for a pic posted here to be so large unless for a > specific reason. For example, Rob Studdert has presented huge pics to show > certain technical details about lenses, but he's also posted the size of > the images. Not to pat myself on the back, but I try to keep my pics to a > maximum of 200K (that number was based on a suggestion or comment made by > Bob Sullivan and a few others), and closer to 150K. If I go much over that > I try to remember to mention it in the introductory post. > > OTOH, there are some people who shall, at least for the time being, go > nameless, who frequently post pics in the 400K - 500K range, and continue > to do so even after it's been suggested that they can reduce the file size. > I rarely bother looking at their photos now. > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Ann Sanfedele > > > Thanks, Paul apology most certainly accepted - > > sure 100k is fine even with my old 'puter, I was thinking > > more of the times > > I tried to download 500k - I felt bad I couldn't see some > > stuff to comment on it. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
