Aaron, I wasn't criticizing anyone, and I wasn't referring to people
who don't have time to submit to the PUG or simply choose not to.  My
comments were in reference to those who recently said that they do not
submit to or comment on the PUG because it is full of inferior work.
Mostly, however, I was trying to use a little humor, and a little
sarcasm, to try to persuade a few more people to participate in the
PUG.  Even if it isn't a good instument for serious photographic work,
it still can be fun and interesting if people submit photos, view the
photos, and comment when they have time.

On 6/20/06, Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As someone who does not submit to the PUG purely because I do not have time 
> (nor do I post photographs to the list except very rarely to illustrate 
> something like hand-holding the 67), I resent being lumped in with a couple 
> of people who felt the need to denigrate the efforts of those who do 
> contribute.
>
> -Aaron
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From:  "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subj:  July PUG deadline today
> Date:  Tue Jun 20, 2006 10:58 am
> Size:  1K
> To:  "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>
>
> The professional photographers among us and the photographic artistes
> have decided that the PUG is beneath them -- too many crude and
> inartistic entries -- but I think that there are still a few amateurs
> on this list who don't take themselves so seriously and would enjoy
> posting in a general gallery like this and later seeing what others
> are doing and how they interpret the theme of the month.  It's fun.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to