That's pretty much what I thought. It will be fine as a lightweight
tripod for hiking. I'll continue to use my 3036 Bogen/Manfrotto for
important work.
Paul
On May 15, 2006, at 8:25 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I happened to be over near the shop today and was curious so I stopped
in. They had the Slik 813 and 814 models. The 813/814 are roughly
equivalent to the Manfrotto 055 models, but simpler and with a less
sophisticated column setup. The 803/804 must be the older model in
this weight.
Overall not bad, but a bit crude compared to the Manfrottos. Probably
just fine for $150.
Godfrey
On May 15, 2006, at 10:05 AM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Slik have two lines: crappy and nice. Most places stock the crappies
because they're cheap.
I never saw one of the 804 CFs in person, but I always wanted one.
Their pro tripods were very nice.
-Aaron
On May 15, 2006, at 12:59 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've not used the Slik and am not sure of the model, but I wasn't
overly impressed with the two at the local camera store. I already
have a set of Manfrotto 3444D legs that I bought when I had the
Hasselblads ... they work great with both the Sony R1 and the Pentax
DS ... but I'm also considering a set of Bogen/Manfrotto 190MF4s as
they're smaller, lighter, have a trickier column for doing macro,
and they're sturdy enough for what I need now. A little pricey but I
like the column design and leg locks.
Godfrey
On May 13, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Has anyone had any experience with this tripod? I picked one up on
ebay for $150 yesterday. I need something light for walks in the
woods. My Bogen 3036 is great, but it's killing me :-).
Paul
